Federal Judge Blocks Arkansas Pro-Life Law, Calls It ‘Imminent Threat’ to Women

by Mary Margaret Olohan

 

A federal judge blocked a pro-life law Tuesday that would have banned almost all abortions in Arkansas, calling the law an “imminent threat” to women seeking abortions.

Judge Kristine Baker issued a preliminary injunction blocking authorities from enforcing the Arkansas Unborn Child Protection Act until she issues a final ruling, according to the Washington Post. The law was set to go into effect July 28.

Republican Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson signed the bill into law in March, banning all abortions except in cases when the abortion would save the life of the mother. The law, which did not make exceptions for rape or incest, is considered one of the strictest pro-life laws in the country.

I signed SB6 because of my sincere and long-held pro-life convictions,” Hutchinson said in a Wednesday statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation. “The court struck down the law because it is in conflict with Roe v. Wade.”

“This legislation had the dual purpose of protecting Arkansas’s unborn and challenging long-standing Supreme Court precedent regarding abortion,” he continued. “I hope the Supreme Court will ultimately accept this case for review.”

Republicans had also written in the law’s text that “it is time for the United States Supreme Court to redress and correct the grave injustice and the crime against humanity which is being perpetuated,” positioning the bill as a challenge to Roe v. Wade.

– – –

Mary Margaret Olohan is a reporter at Daily Caller News Foundation.
Photos “Hon. Kristine Gerhard Baker” by University of Arkansas and “Arkansas State Capitol” by Daniel Schwen (CC BY-SA 4.0).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

Related posts

3 Thoughts to “Federal Judge Blocks Arkansas Pro-Life Law, Calls It ‘Imminent Threat’ to Women”

  1. Tim Price

    This judge is a liberal hack and should be removed from the bench. Each state has the right to decide its own course in matters such as this.

  2. JB Taylor

    If tax payer money is used to pay for an abortion, then the procedure should require sterilization at the same time. So we don’t have to pay for the same procedure over and over and over. And the father, should be required to get fixed also for the same reason.

  3. JB Taylor

    So she blocked the law based on feelings and not on actual law. She needs to be removed from her position as judge.

Comments